Should smokers, drinkers, drug users and obese people be charged to see the doctor?
Watch this postIt seems reasonable to me, after all, they consume a very large chunk of the NHS budget, so I think it's entirely appropriate that they stump up for their treatment. What do you think?
Community Terms & Conditions
Content standards
These content standards apply to any and all material which you contribute to our site (contributions), and to any interactive services associated with it.
You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The standards apply to each part of any contribution as well as to its whole.
Contributions must:
be accurate (where they state facts); be genuinely held (where they state opinions); and comply with applicable law in the UK and in any country from which they are posted.
Contributions must not:
contain any material which is defamatory of any person; or contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory; or promote sexually explicit material; or promote violence; promote discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age; or infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person; or be likely to deceive any person; or be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence; or promote any illegal activity; or be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety; or be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person; or be used to impersonate any person, or to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person; or give the impression that they emanate from us, if this is not the case; or advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.
Nurturing a safe environment
Our Silversurfers community is designed to foster friendships, based on trust, honesty, integrity and loyalty and is underpinned by these values.
We don't tolerate swearing, and reserve the right to remove any posts which we feel may offend others... let's keep it friendly!
Due to more than one chronic illness which has at times made me immobile unable to wash and dress and feed myself at times.
Although regularly poorly, I rarely visit a doctor dentist or optician.
Mostly when the appointment date/day arrives I’m too tired sore or ill
to go, I do of course cancel my appointment so no ones time is wasted.
On my reduced income, being unable to work I would struggle to pay for the doctors appointment.
I explain from an immobile situation only, as that’s all I personally know about and understand.
I live with being overweight and have been so since a child due to suffering Hasimotos Thyroiditis which affects every part of my body mechanics and slows the metabolism down.
All my life has been a constant diet and exercise regime.
At my age now my metabolism is non existent. This has been exasperated due to yo yo dieting and I've recently found out that exercising too hard can cause additional problems with health and make you more fatigued!
Recently I needed a new hip due to Osteo Arthritis, I need my other hip replacing soon, would people be so quick to deny me surgery and remove the constant pain I live with I wonder? Unable to walk and move means I cannot exercise hence weight gain even though I eat minimum calories per day.
Sometimes I believe like you, that people should be a little more forgiving, I too pay my taxes.
Please people think first,
I thank you Trish.
Eg my wife had a friend who was admitted to hospital with a VERY serious condition. Despite the doctor telling her that her smoking was both exacerbating the condition and reducing the effectiveness if not negating the treatment she was being given, she carried on smoking and her partner carried on providing her with cigarettes. Now you can argue addiction but she ‘gave up’ for over 12 months just the previous year and started smoking again due to a messy divorce ie she could give up again. It’s also worth noting that she also refused to try nicotine patches or gum. So she understands the risks fully, knows that she could do something about it but simply refuses to do so.
In that example why should tax payers money be spent on that treatment when she is deliberately worsening her condition in a place she’s gone to improve it. In such a situation I believe that harsh love is needed by saying that treatment will not be provided on the NHS unless she starts to help that healing process by quitting smoking or at least taking steps to do so..
In other words people have to play their part.
On balance though. It could be argued that the high tax on cigarettes pays for that treatment but we all know that the NHS doesn’t get it.
The harsh reality is that given a choice between your child receiving effective treatment of the highest standard with the prospects of a full recovery or my friend receiving that money for essentially wasted treatment and so preventing your child having the best treatment, which would you choose? That IS the choice we are sadly talking about with the NHS as the Liverpool hospital fiasco demonstrates.
Therefore in summary, if someone can’t be bothered to help themselves, then they shouldn’t expect others to help them for free.
I went on to develop a problem with alcohol. This is seen as being a disease. I don't drink at all now. But should I have been punished.
I hate the fact that we are often looked upon as being a burden upon the NHS as we are living longer. We are the ones who have spent our lives paying into the system, and still remain to do so and everything is still taxed.
What we should maybe ask is, Can we get a rebate if we don't need to use the NHS?
If some of these people don't want to take advice from doctors/specialists then maybe they should be asked to pay extra because otherwise doctors/specialists are just wasting their time trying to change patients lifestyles for the better and won't use NHS resources unnecessarily.
If say, after 3 attempts to encourage patients to change their lifestyle for the better and they still continue to smoke, eat unhealthy or take drugs etc then charge them for the doctors/specialist's time. If people genuinely want to give up their vices they might take notice earlier so then that way they won't incur extra payments.
I am all for encouraging people to adopt a healthy lifestyle but it isn't always a simple matter of choice. Those who believe it is simply a matter of 'pulling yourself together' may not have witnessed the misery some people have to endure because of a path they took when younger thinking it was the right way, only to find later in life it was not.
The principle of the NHS is 'free at there point of delivery' and this was based on the premise that no one should be denied health care based on their ability to pay and/or their life style. Being poor is not necessarily a choice and sometimes the only way they can cope is to do those things we are advised not to.
Correction, drug abuse is not a illness if it was was it would be treatable quite easily. It is an addiction - a person has to want to come of drugs to be treated and it can take a while for someone to give up their addiction. The same with smoking and alcoholism.
There are other ways to cope if there wasn't we would all be addicts!!
Addiction is an illness if not a physical one, surely mental illness shouldn't be ignored because it is difficult to treat? I agree that an addict has to have the will to try and 'kick' their habit, but that shouldn't exclude them from being treated and treated with compassion. Many try for years before they succeed, I accept that some never succeed but they still need support to keep trying. Their illness may have stemmed from their addiction but many diseases stem from lifestyle choices and yet we do not question those?
In my career, I met with people who had IQ's well above the Normal range, yet they had required help for Addiction. Intelligence would normally show a substance of whatever kind should not be taken, yet they do it. On the other hand, I met with people who had lost everything, through no fault of their own, like a car crash that kills a whole family, leaving no-one behind except for this one person. They endure pain beyond belief, but don't feel it necessary to have some sedation to help them sleep. Their level of resistance is entirely different, not stronger or more sensible, just different. The person who goes to the Pub each night, because their home is empty of company, has a greater chance of becoming addicted to alcohol, but it does not happen to all of them.
We cannot generalise about a person who is right or wrong, or what they begin with will shorten their life-span, because there are people who live to be very old indeed, who have smoked all of their adult lives, while another person dies prematurely, for having made the same choice.
Compassion is something we all need at some point in our lives as human beings. Better to give it, too. As who knows when we may need it for ourselves. Kindness doesn't cost anything, neither does love and support. If we all offered it to someone, there might never be a need for some people to need the crutch they find themselves taking and relying on. Just holding the hand of someone in emotional or physical pain can make It easier to bare. Like-wise, it could help us too, one day.
As an obese person I would like to know where the weight limit would be set, I may be a few pounds over but then manage to lose them to qualify for free treatment a couple of months later.
Unless you have personal experience or have worked in the health/social care sector it is all too easy to generalize regarding substance abuse and come up with solutions but unfortunately it is not a one size fits all solution that is required but an individual approach . Yes some people seem beyond help but that doesn't mean they should be written off for ever.
As someone who does have years of experience in the Healthcare Sector, I can confirm there is Never a One Size Fits All.
Person Centred Care is what it is all about, and as such, each Person is an Individual who is treated as such.
The idea of this is quite obvious, because of each Person being Different from the next.
The NHS does accept Everyone for Who they are, and not which box they fit into.
I had the misfortune of needing emergency care in the early part of this year. There was Never a point where I was put into a box, to be treated the same as the Person in the next bed, or even across the ward. I was treated as Me. The NHS is a huge Back-Bone to health & well-being, and each of the Staff who appears in front of you will never consider you the same as the next person they see. I can vouch for the fact, by explaining how I had very similar 'symptoms' to the person next to me, but at every point we were treated completely differently. The same age, the same colour, the same back-grounds, the same amount of children and grandchildren. It would appear we'd come out of the same box, but we hadn't. I have numerous health issues, and so did the person to who I am referring in the next bed. However, that is where the differences lay - We did Not have the same health issues, just similar symptoms on the day of admission to hospital. That Person was treated with one set of treatments, and I was treated with another. I left hospital still requiring lots of care at home, while I said Good-bye to my new friend who would be staying in for longer than I had to.
It makes sense in the long term, for everyone to be managed in a different way, so the speed of recovery if possible, is met in the fastest way.
We ARE all different.
You have taken my point and explained it fully, but you have healthcare experience understand as I do person centered planning .However it was not until I started training in social care in my forties that my attitudes and understanding of peoples needs changed.Therefore I understand that those who are less understanding are those that don't fully understand the reasons and causes of addiction abuse and judge from a position of the outside looking in rather than inside looking out.
There are many things in life I don't properly understand politics,finance sport to name a few I have opinions based on what I see ,read and hear but I always try not to judge unfairly,Surely in matters of health and well being being non judgemental and kind is of the greatest importance. I am not trying to imply you need to have professional experience in health care to care just show empathy as Mrs H says it could you that needs help next.
I also think we need to get in to the 21st Century and look at the benefits of cannabis, and stop making people into criminals wanting to use it for medicinal purposes. I personally cannot drink and I don't care to smoke thank you very much but I would certainly find having a cannabis muffin now and again very relaxing. Research was carried out and out of the three: smoking, drinking or cannabis, cannabis came out as actually having benefits whilst the other two are just harmful.
My husband died a year ago and I now have a drink problem! A bottle of wine a day! I do not want to involve my doctor at this stage as I live in a small village and I am afraid my medical records will be accessed by the receptionists who know me and would spread gossip. Drinking is a widespread problem. Self help should be available in the early stages as it is for weight problems and smoking, without the shame of being viewed as an alcoholic or involving my doctor.
If they have lived abroad for more than ten years, then possibly not. However I do strongly believe those who have lived in the UK until government retirement age and then want to live the rest of their lives in a better climate should of course be entitled health care here.